Give a founder's birth date, a business name and a date range, and this scans every day in the range against five numerical checks: the date's own number against the founder's Mulank, the full date against the Bhagyank, the full date against the business name's number, the weekday's graha against the business name, and the founder's Personal Day against the Mulank. Each day is reported with how many checks it met and which ones, with the arithmetic printed. It returns whole days and never a time, because this method knows nothing about the sky.
A business muhurat is elected from the panchang: the tithi, the vara, the nakshatra, the yoga, the karana, the ascendant at the chosen moment, and a list of doshas to avoid. It rests on named classical rules and it gives you a time of day, because a muhurat is a moment.
This page reduces a calendar date to digits and asks whether those digits get on with your numbers. It touches no panchang limb and computes nothing from planetary positions. That is why it returns days rather than times - a clock time here would imply an electional precision the method does not have.
Both tools are on this site. Run both. Where they disagree, the panchang one is the one with a classical source behind it.
The result reports how many of the five matched and which. It does not weight them and does not convert the count to a percentage, because nothing in this practice says the weekday lord is worth more or less than the personal day. The page also publishes how common each count is across the range you scanned - a 4 of 5 means nothing until you know whether forty other days in the range also scored 4.
The founder's Personal Year is shown for every calendar year the range touches, with what that year is like to start a venture in - modern practice reads 1 and 8 as the initiating years, with 3 and 5 close behind.
It is deliberately NOT one of the five per-date checks. A Personal Year is constant across a year, so as a check it would return the same answer on every date in a normal scan and inflate every tally by exactly one, which is a row of noise rather than a discriminator. It is context, and it is labelled as context.
The letter values are Cheiro's Chaldean table, from a modern Western book of 1926. The weekday lords are the ordinary planetary week and are genuinely classical; the rule that a weekday lord's NUMBER should befriend a business name's NUMBER is not, and is labelled as modern practice. The friend-or-not grid that decides every match here has no located source of any kind, classical or otherwise, and the page says so beside the result rather than in small print.
No. A muhurat is elected from the panchang - tithi, vara, nakshatra, yoga, karana and the ascendant at the moment - under classical rules, and it gives a time of day. This reads the digits of a date against your numbers and gives whole days. Both are on this site and the pages link to each other.
Because it has no way to know one. Nothing in this method varies within a day: the date's digits, the weekday and your personal day are all the same at dawn and at dusk. Printing a time would imply a precision the technique does not have.
Modern practice reads them as heavy and the page flags them where they occur, with the graha named. Nothing is deducted, because there is no score to deduct from - a flagged date can still meet four of the five checks and it will be shown doing so.
Up to a year in one pass. A longer range is trimmed automatically, and the results are capped at the best days by how many checks they met, earliest first among equals.
Two of the five checks read the business name's Chaldean number, so it matters. Change the name and the shortlist changes - which is also why the Business Name Numerology tool exists as a separate step before this one.
For educational purposes. Astrological interpretations are traditional and not a substitute for professional advice.