Bṛhat Saṁhitā chapter 53 - a complete 125-verse house manual, read at chapter and verse. The maṇḍala, the 32 entrance padas, the marma geometry, the rooms, the water, the slope and the remedies.
North taken from an uncorrected compass, which reads MAGNETIC north, not true north. Magnetic declination across India is small but non-zero and varies by region and by epoch — look it up for this location and correct for it before trusting any result here. A pada is one eighth of a side. On a 12-metre edge that is 1.5 m, so a few degrees of error in north can move a door from Bhallāṭa to Soma and change the reading outright.
Every pada number on this page is N. Chidambaram Iyer's, from his 1885 English of Bṛhat Saṁhitā ch. 53 — not Varāhamihira's. The Sanskrit places each deity by a direction-word and contains no numerals at all. Iyer's numbering is coherent and closes to the pada, which is why it is used; it is one Victorian translator, not three agreeing texts, and the direction is printed beside every number for that reason.
There is no Vāstu score here, and there will not be one. Nothing in this corpus weights one defect against another — no verse says a misplaced kitchen is worth three wells — so a number out of 100 would have no source and the false authority of a single figure. Every finding stands on its own verse.
Your birth chart is not used here, and nothing on this page changes with it. The vāstu corpus touches jyotiṣa in exactly one place — choosing an auspicious hour to BEGIN CONSTRUCTION (Bṛhat Saṁhitā 53.98, Matsya Purāṇa 253.2-10). Personalising vāstu remedies by horoscope is modern practice with no located locus, and a vāstu module inside a kundali app should say so rather than let the adjacency imply it.
Two measurements are not a shape: the grid is laid on a rectangle, but 53.115 asks whether the ground under it is actually even.
Bṛhat Saṁhitā 53.118 with Matsya Purāṇa 256.33-35 - seven rooms placed by name. Until you say what is where, all seven verses stand unread.
Unanswered - 'not determined' below.
Bṛhat Saṁhitā 53.79-82 - twelve faults, each of them noticed by using the door.
Unanswered - 'not determined' below.
53.116 is about a raised side and 53.115 about a raised corner - two different questions, so both are asked.
Unanswered - 'not determined' below.
A cut corner is the classical aṅga-hāni, and it is priced by which limb of the Vāstu Puruṣa is missing, not by which corner it is (53.67-68).
Unanswered - 'not determined' below.
Bṛhat Saṁhitā 53.85-86 - four species each with a side of its own, and three classes that count wherever they stand. The side is half the rule.
Unanswered - 'not determined' below.
Bṛhat Saṁhitā 53.89-90 - the verse asks neither the side nor the distance, only whether it is near.
Unanswered - 'not determined' below.
These are physical procedures and the app cannot run them - it can state the method, it cannot dig the pit. Only these three of the five return a verdict; the lamp, the flower and the colour-smell-taste tests return a person's varṇa and are held in the register below.
The pit test (53.92)
The water test (53.93)
The seed test (Matsya 253.18)
The vaṁśa lines and the nine atimarma cells are marked on the grid above - read the pada number off it (1-81).
Unanswered - 'not determined' below.
East (top)
North (left)
South (right)
West (bottom)
'Not determined' does not mean 'clear'. It means the question was asked and no answer came back, and every such row carries the verse that could not be read and what it needs in order to be read.
No door was described
Not determinedThe door's position along its side is not known.
No cell can be read. The verses attach a result to each eighth of each side, so the eighth is the whole input - give the pada 1-8 counted from the side's own starting corner, or the door's distance along that side together with the plot's dimensions.
The entrance is the largest single input this reading takes: each of the thirty-two cells of 53.71-75 carries its own result, and the Brahmā-gate interlock of 53.78 is decided by that same cell. Name the door's side and its pada 1-8 and both are read at once.
Which room stands in which quarter was not described.
Not determinedSeven rooms are placed by name in these verses - the shrine in the north-east, the kitchen in the south-east, the store in the south-west, the treasury and the granary in the north-west, the water-store to the north, and the bathing place outside the building altogether. Not one of them can be inferred from a plot's measurements; each needs someone to say what is where.
Until that is said the seven verses stand unread, and an unread verse has not been satisfied.
Seven rooms are placed by name in 53.118 and the Matsya parallels, and none of them can be read off a measurement — somebody has to say what is where.
Whether any water stands on the plot, and in which quarter, was not stated.
Not determinedThis verse is a complete eight-cell table: only the north and the north-east are auspicious, and the other six quarters each carry a named harm. It is the cited warrant behind the north-east water rule that modern practice repeats without one - but it decides nothing at all until someone says whether there is a well, tank or sump here and where it lies.
53.119 is a complete eight-cell table and every cell of it is waiting on one fact: is there a well, tank or sump on this plot, and in which quarter does it lie?
The levels of the ground were not described
Not determinedThe ground is levelled before building.
“He that desires prosperity shall raise the house-ground equally on all sides. If any portion of the ground be of a higher level than the rest, there will be misery. If unavoidable, the eastern or northern side may be of a slightly higher level.”
The verse asks one thing of the ground — that it be equally high on every side — and half a description cannot show that. A defect can be proved from a partial answer, because one raised portion is enough; an absence of defects cannot. Report the sides AND the corners, or that neither rises.
Whether any corner stands higher was not described
Not determinedThe north-eastern CORNER is at a higher level than the rest.
“If the north-eastern corner be of a higher level than the rest; there will be loss of wealth and sons.”
53.115 prices a raised CORNER, and a corner is not a side — a plot can be level along all four edges and still rise at the north-east. It is asked separately because the verse asks it separately.
Which way the ground falls was not stated
Not determinedThe ground's slope is chosen.
The building should be made having downward slopes towards the NORTH - the north side low, the south high. That is the opposite of what Bṛhat Saṁhitā 53.116 tolerates. Two classical texts, two directions, and this app renders the conflict rather than picking a winner.
This is the one place where two classical texts point in opposite directions — Matsya 256.1 wants the fall towards the north, Bṛhat Saṁhitā 53.116 tolerates the east or the north being HIGH. An unstated slope leaves both rows unread rather than settling either.
Cited at chapter and verse, but from a single reading of a single scan — the adversarial cross-check could not reach this edition, so the wording here is ours, not the translator's.
Whether the plan is extended in any direction was not stated
Not determinedThe house is extended towards one direction only.
The governing principle: the house should not be extended in one direction only; if extension is to be made it should be made uniformly and symmetrically in all directions. Every single-direction extension below carries a named harm, the north-east included.
The governing principle is about UNIFORMITY, so it needs the whole outline, not one direction: an extension towards the north-east alone and an extension on all eight sides are opposite answers to the same verse. Name every direction the plan runs out in, or say it runs out in none.
Cited at chapter and verse, but from a single reading of a single scan — the adversarial cross-check could not reach this edition, so the wording here is ours, not the translator's.
Whether any corner of the outline is cut was not stated
Not determinedA limb of the Vāstu Puruṣa is missing - the classical form of a cut corner.
Right arm missing → loss of wealth. Left arm missing → loss of wealth and grain. Head missing → every virtue quits the household. An uninjured Vāstu Puruṣa → honour, wealth and comfort. This is the classical original of the modern corner-cut doctrine, and note that it is stated in terms of the BODY, not of the corner.
Two further clauses of 53.67-68 are withheld: they are chastity verdicts, the class §15 excludes.
A cut corner is the classical aṅga-hāni — a missing limb of the Vāstu Puruṣa — and the corpus prices it by which limb it is, not by which corner. Head is north-east, feet south-west, right side to the south-east half. Which limb is missing is the whole rule, so name the cut corners — or say the outline is whole.
Nothing was said about what stands on the vital points
Not determinedA marma is violated by a pillar, a peg, an impurity or a buried śalya.
“the master of the house will suffer in those parts of his body which correspond to the parts thus tormented”
The vaṁśa lines and their nine crossings are computed from the grid and returned with it; what stands ON them is not something a grid can know. A pillar, a peg, an impurity or something buried — name the pada it sits on, 1 to 81, and the body map of 53.51-54 does the rest.
What stands opposite the gate was not described
Not determinedSomething stands opposite the gate at a measurable distance.
“There will be misery if, opposite to the gate, there be roads, trees, street corners, wells, pillars or gutters. If these should be beyond a distance of double the height of the house, they will produce no harm.”
Six things are priced when they face a gate — a street, a tree, a street corner, a well, a pillar, a gutter — and two more are added by the same verses. Say which of them faces yours and at what distance, and the one quantified exemption in the chapter, d > 2h, can be applied.
How the door itself behaves was not described.
Not determinedTwelve faults in this passage are about the door's conduct rather than its position - a leaf that opens or closes of itself, an over-size door, one set in low ground, a gate above a gate, an entrance that cannot be shut, one bent inward or outward, one that equals the inner door.
None of them can be read off a plan; each is something a household notices by using the door. Until they are described these twelve verses stand unread, which is not the same as their being absent.
Twelve cited results are waiting on this and none of them can be computed — go and look at the door.
What grows close to the house was not described.
Not determinedSeven rules hang on this: four named species, each harmful on one side and prosperous on the side opposite, and three classes - thorny, milky and fruit-bearing - that the verse prices wherever they stand. The side is half of the first four rules, so a species named without a side still decides nothing.
Say what stands close to the house and on which side of it, and these verses can be read.
Seven cited results are waiting on this — four species with a side each, and three classes that count wherever they stand.
What stands in the neighbourhood was not described.
Not determinedSeven neighbours are named in this passage - a minister's house, a cheat's house, a temple, a meeting of four roads, a Buddhist temple, ant-hills, a ditch - and the verse prices each without asking on which side it stands or how far off.
It is the one family here that needs no measurement at all, only a look around; until that look is reported, none of the seven has been ruled out.
The cheapest input in this whole reading — it costs one walk around the block — and seven cited results are waiting on it.
The shape of the plot was not stated
Not determinedThe ground is of irregular shape, or has irregular sides.
Ground of irregular shape → kinsmen die. Irregular sides → no pregnancy. Ground that faces no particular direction → no children.
Two numbers do not give a shape. A length and a breadth describe the rectangle this reading lays its grid on; whether the ground under it is actually four-sided and even is a separate question, and it is the one 53.115 asks.
The pit test was not run
Not determinedDig a pit one cubit each way at the centre of the site and refill it with the earth taken out.
Earth left over → increase of wealth. Exactly enough → a middling site. Not enough to fill it → misery. This test and the next are the two that return a verdict rather than a caste, and they are the two this app evaluates.
Dig one cubit each way at the centre of the site and refill the pit with the same earth; report whether earth was left over, whether it came out exact, or whether it fell short. Nothing about this can be inferred from a measurement, and an unrun test is not a good result.
The water test was not run
Not determinedFill the same pit with water, walk a hundred feet away and return.
If the water has not fallen, increase of wealth.
Fill the same pit with water, walk a hundred feet away and come back; report whether the water had fallen. The verse asks about this ground on this day, so no soil map and no measurement stands in for it.
The seed test was not run
Not determinedPlough the land and sow seed; watch what comes up in three, five or seven days.
Big sprouts → the best land. Middling sprouts → middling land. Small sprouts → avoid the land. A sixth test the Bṛhat Saṁhitā does not have, and the one Matsya test that returns a verdict rather than a varṇa.
Plough the land, sow seed and see what comes up in three, five or seven days. This is the sixth test and the only one of Matsya's that returns a verdict rather than a varṇa — and it is the slowest, which is a poor reason to treat it as answered.
Cited at chapter and verse, but from a single reading of a single scan — the adversarial cross-check could not reach this edition, so the wording here is ours, not the translator's.
The state of the central 9 padas was not stated
Not determinedThe nine central padas - the Brahmasthāna - are defiled by impurities.
“If the master of the house desire prosperity, he shall take particular care of the portion of the house which is the seat of Brahma. If this portion be defiled by impurities, the master of the house will suffer miseries.”
The grid names exactly which padas these are, and this reading returns them. Whether they are kept clean or carry impurities is the one thing about them no computation can see, and it is the whole of the rule.
Several of the things a vāstu product is usually asked for have no classical locus at all. The form above offers no control for any of them and never will - asking a question implies an answer exists. Each row below carries the search that produced the negative, because a negative result is only as good as its search term.
Some results in Bṛhat Saṁhitā ch. 53 are verdicts on the character of women or on caste, and three of the plot tests return a person's varṇa. Their loci are recorded here; their words are printed nowhere. Silently dropping a clause is not withholding - it is hiding.
Bṛhat Saṁhitā 53.67 (Iyer numbering, Part II, 1885)
The aṅga-hāni verse for a missing right arm carries a chastity clause about the women of the household alongside its loss-of-wealth clause. The wealth clause renders; the chastity clause does not.
Bṛhat Saṁhitā 53.68 (Iyer numbering, Part II, 1885)
The injured-senses verse opens with a chastity clause, then names two further consequences. The research file dropped the opening clause without saying so and printed the other two; here the whole verse is recorded as withheld-class and the two printable consequences are given at marma-anga-hani with the omission disclosed.
Bṛhat Saṁhitā 53.78 (Iyer numbering, Part II, 1885)
The result for a pillar standing opposite the gate is a chastity verdict. The obstruction is still reported - the reader needs to know a pillar opposite the door is a defect at all - and its stated phala is not.
Bṛhat Saṁhitā 53.119 (Iyer numbering, Part II, 1885), the west cell
One cell of an otherwise clean eight-cell water table. The other seven render in full, including the two auspicious ones that are the classical warrant for the north-east water rule.
Bṛhat Saṁhitā 53.75 (Iyer numbering, Part II, 1885), the Aditi door pada
One of the thirty-two entrance cells. The position, the deity and the locus all render; the phala does not.
Bṛhat Saṁhitā 53.73 (Iyer numbering, Part II, 1885), the Vitatha door pada
A caste verdict about the householder, the same class already withheld from Bṛhat Saṁhitā 68.35.
Bṛhat Saṁhitā 53.94-97, with 53.70 and 53.91 (Iyer numbering, Part II, 1885)
The lamp, flower and colour/smell/taste tests each return a VARṆA - which caste the ground suits - and 53.70 and 53.91 make the whole spatial scheme caste-indexed. The procedures are described because a reader is entitled to know the chapter contains them; the verdict about a person is not returned. The pit-refill and water-retention tests return good/middling/bad and are evaluated in full.
This reading is grounded in Bṛhat Saṁhitā ch. 53, from N. Chidambaram Iyer's public-domain 1885 English, and where noted in the Matsya Purāṇa, the Agni Purāṇa, the Mānasāra and the Mayamata. Rows marked unverified rest on a single reading of a single scan. No vāstu score is produced here and your birth chart is not used. For educational purposes.