Self-employment read as its own question, against the verses that separate trade from profession.
BPHS ch. 11 v. 8 puts trade in the seventh house, alongside the spouse and travel. The tenth (v. 11) is authority, place, livelihood and profession, honour, the father, living in foreign lands, and debts. The eleventh (v. 12) is articles of every kind, income, prosperity and four-footed animals. A business reading built only on the tenth is therefore reading the wrong house against that chapter, and this page reads all three side by side and never merges them: three bhavas, three verdicts, no average.
That separation is what lets the page answer a business question rather than a career question. Those are different questions in the texts themselves. How a salaried profession will go is a tenth-house matter; whether to trade on one's own account is a seventh-house matter; and what actually arrives as income is an eleventh-house matter. Merging them into one verdict would hide which house each statement came from, which is precisely the information a reader needs in order to check it.
The comparison the page draws is between the seventh's three legs and the tenth's three legs, judged by Phaladeepika ch. 15 exactly as every other house in this app is judged. 15.3 on the lord standing in the eighth; 15.4-15.5 on malefics in the sixth, eighth and twelfth counted from the house itself; 15.25 when house, lord and karaka are all strong; 15.6 when all three are weak, with the chapter's own counted intensity rather than a weight.
The output is a comparison of two independently cited readings, plus a flag when they diverge. It is not a recommendation. No text in this corpus tells a native to be self-employed, and this app does not invent one; what the texts do is describe how a house stands, and how a house stands is a fact about a chart.
Where 15.25 speaks of strength without defining it, the six-clause test from Phaladeepika ch. XX is borrowed and the borrowing is disclosed, because that test is stated of a dasha lord and applying it outside a dasha is this application's extension.
The most business-shaped statement in the classical career material is about a counterparty, and a page that prints only an occupation list throws it away. Brihat Jataka ch.
X v. 1 says that the graha occupying the tenth rasi from the lagna, or the tenth from the Moon, names the relation through whom wealth is acquired: the Sun the father, the Moon the mother, Mars an enemy, Mercury a friend, Jupiter a brother, Venus the wife, Saturn a servant. Iyer's 1885 translation is in the public domain, so the verse's own words ship beside the reading.
Both tenths are checked, and the chapter's own note is honoured rather than simplified: if the tenth from the ascendant and the tenth from the Moon are both occupied, wealth comes from both sources, and several planets in a tenth give several sources.
When no graha occupies either tenth, the chapter's second limb applies instead, and it works from the lord of the tenth reckoned from the lagna, from the Moon and from the Sun, then from the navamsa each of those three lords occupies. The determinant is always the lord of the tenth, never the lagna, Moon or Sun itself.
For a partnership the seventh is read as the house of the other party: its lord, its occupants, and Venus as its karaka by Phaladeepika 15.17. That makes Venus in the seventh the single most discussed configuration in the chapter, because 15.26 records the minority view that a karaka standing in its own bhava distresses that bhava, and Venus in the seventh is exactly that case.
BPHS ch. 7 vv. 39-43 ships beside it with the opposite valence: the seventh may also be known from Venus, where the word also makes it corroboration rather than a penalty. The two texts genuinely disagree, so both are rendered and neither is chosen. This is the same disagreement the progeny page shows for Jupiter in the fifth, computed by the same shared routine so that the two surfaces can never drift into answering it differently.
Phaladeepika ch. XX reads a dasha by what its lord rules, so the dashas of the seventh, tenth and eleventh lords are the business-shaped periods of a life, and they fall in a different order for every ascendant. Each window carries both halves of the chapter, favourable and adverse, with the chapter's own six-clause strength test selecting between them and reporting the result as undetermined when the test does not decide, which this app also does not.
Four things are absent on purpose. There is no date on which to start a business, because that is muhurta, a different engine, and it already has its own page. There is no industry list keyed to the Dasamsa: the D10's construction is BPHS ch. 6 v. 13, which cuts each sign into ten parts of 3 degrees counted from the sign itself in an odd sign and from its ninth in an even sign, but the assignment of profession as the D10's subject is modern attribution and is labelled as such, so what ships is the D10's own three legs on its seventh and tenth.
There is no score, because not one number in this reading is a weighting. And there is no prediction of profit or loss, because no verse read for this feature supplies one.